<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cultural Imperialist&#187; Cultural Imperialist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/tag/relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culturalimperialist.com</link>
	<description>Scathing Spats on Shallow Subjects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should You Be a Surrogate Boyfriend?</title>
		<link>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/05/substitutionary-sacrifice-surrogate-boyfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/05/substitutionary-sacrifice-surrogate-boyfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boyfriend and girlfriend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationship article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogate boyfriend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturalimperialist.com/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we step in to fill the shoes of our brethren who leave their girls alone, even if it's just in the guise of a friend in need? Or is that just bad politics?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-832" title="surrogate_thumb" src="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/surrogate_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="173" />Should we step in to fill the shoes of our brethren who leave their girls alone, even if it's just in the guise of a friend in need? Or is that just bad politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/05/substitutionary-sacrifice-surrogate-boyfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutie-Spotting Is Unavoidable</title>
		<link>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/03/cutie-spotting-unavoidable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/03/cutie-spotting-unavoidable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Modern Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Culturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ace of Cakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutie spotting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoping out the cuties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturalimperialist.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world is a smorgasbord of hotties. But for men who are firmly entrenched in a relationship, is it morally acceptable to scope out the cuties?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_518" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 370px"><a href="http://lookbook.nu/user/115107-Sylwia-S" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-518" title="goldfish" src="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/goldfish.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="306" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image courtesy of Lookbook.nu</p></div>
<p>The world is a smorgasbord of hotties. This is not a surprise, especially if you're from Sweden or Southern California, where a disproportionate number of babes, models, hot chicks, and sexy coeds originate. For single men, the landscape is an almost mind-numbing swath of feminine beauty, and like browsing the farmer's market, the bachelors can look and date at will. There's a reason the word allure contains a word also used in fishing. Those with godlike powers of persuasion could easily maintain a casual dating regimen to cover much of the population of perfectly proportioned pulchritudinous princesses.</p>
<p>But what about men who are firmly entrenched in a relationship? Is it morally acceptable for attached males to scope out the cuties?</p>
<p>As one of those attached males, I have firsthand experience with this issue; living in Southern California, I have the blessing and curse of being confronted with the bountiful crop of beautiful women and the instinctual male urge to simply look. Forget lust, this is like driving by a horrible traffic collision. Like car accidents, women prompt autonomic ocular responses. And like rubbernecking, there's a sense that if not reprehensible, the gazing from afar is not exactly high value activity, especially if you're in a committed relationship to a woman you may have previously rubbernecked before you became attached to her. <div id="detail_col_right" class="more"><h3>More from Jeremiah Lewis</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/corruption-crackdown-chalupa-challenger/">Corruption Crackdown: The Chalupa Challenger</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/nehruing-day-nehru/">Neh-ruing the Day: No to Nehru</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/07/gaga-bad-enanciation/">Gaga for Bad En-anc-iation</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/07/slouching-tenenbaum/">Slouching Toward Tenenbaum</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/06/russia-hotties/">From Russia, With Hotties</a></li></ul></div></p>
<p>Can guys make mental maps of the feminine representatives without falling into the soul-damning territory of adultery and fornication?</p>
<p>Here I will step out of my role as beleaguered man and step into the role of impartial observer, and point to Ace of Cakes and beta fish as an answer to the dilemma at hand.</p>
<p>Ace of Cakes is a television show that features a master baker and his team of elite pastry specialists creating a cake for a client; perhaps the cake is for a wedding, or a bar mitzvah, or in honor of a bicentennial. The cake created for each event is a work of art in its own right, and often is elaborately built with materials rivaling those used in large construction projects.</p>
<p>One gets the sense that these cakes are the most beautiful baked goods ever created, but after all the sawing and cutting and painting, the thought of tasting these cakes is almost abhorrent. Not only would it be a crime to destroy these works of art by cutting into and consuming them, but that even to do so would result in dissatisfaction; the cake is not meant to be eaten, only admired and appreciated.</p>
<p>Back to beleaguered hero: to men with a woman (beautiful or not) on their arm, other beautiful women are like the cakes baked by the Ace.</p>
<p>Put another way, the ladies pass in and out of the male consciousness like betas in a twenty gallon tank. We see them on the street, they occupy the moment and possibly co-opt our glandular functionality, but six seconds later, the memory and the moment are gone. To restrict or morally judge as unacceptable the very nature of male existence is not only anti-Darwinian, it is scientifically impossible.</p>
<p>However, we are not only creatures of instinct, but we are creatures of reason. Men must know the line they walk is always precarious, and must guard against the incursions of infidelity and the tyranny of titillation. When it comes to the babes that pass in the night, there might be no better mantra than that of the goldfish: To look is human; to forget is ichthyine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/03/cutie-spotting-unavoidable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interracial Couples Aren&#8217;t *That* Happy</title>
		<link>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/01/interracial-couples-happy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/01/interracial-couples-happy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Piper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Culturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interracial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturalimperialist.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surest way to get someone to spend on your product or cause is slapping a broad cross-section of humanity on a billboard.  Often this means a roughly equal balance of men and women, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, Arab and Persian, unless UN sanctions stretch over to modeling. But you know what's even harder to swallow?  Interracial bliss.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-305" title="interracial" src="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/interracial1.jpg" alt="interracial" width="300" height="286" />The surest way to get someone to spend on your product or cause is slapping a broad cross-section of humanity on a billboard.  Often this means a roughly equal balance of men and women, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, Arab and Persian, unless UN sanctions stretch over to modeling.  Speaking of stretches, I saw a billboard campaign on the subway to get GLBT people (and maybe the Q's, too) to stop smoking, which is slightly more challenging than making them straight.</p>
<p>But you know what's even harder to swallow?  Interracial bliss.</p>
<p>You can put a snoring black man and a bemused black woman in bed together (another subway campaign, promoting marriage) and it looks about right, but every portrayal of interracial couples makes them seem like Will Ferrell and Rachel Dratch's "Lov-ah" characters from SNL. Wrapped around each other, beaming, endorphins rushing as their eyes meet and their globules of melanin wriggle with excitement, these diverse dyads have no problem that some combination of big booty, no booty, slanted eyes, Afro, Jewfro, horn-rimmed glasses, grillz, purple highlights and wispy goatee can't fix. The power of colorful love can even win elections - ask New York City's new public advocate, white guy Bill De Blasio, his black wife and whack (white/black) kids,<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EZDdn3fWd4&amp;feature=player_embedded"> who starred prominently in his TV ads</a>. <div id="detail_col_right" class="more"><h3>More from Greg Piper</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/09/chuck-heavens-home-zachary-levi/">Up, “Chuck”: This Heaven’s Not a Home without Zachary Levi</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/big-love-outraged-tom-hanks-underage-sex/">"Big" Love: Why aren't we outraged by Tom Hanks' underage sex?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/inject-solution-rowdy-concerts/">I Inject! The Solution to Rowdy Concerts</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/kagan-exercises-confirmation-conquest/">Kagan Exercises: Confirmation as Conquest</a></li><li><a href="http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/08/yada-sisterhood-gibberish-ruining-abbreviated-sentences/">The "Yada" Sisterhood: Gibberish Ruining Abbreviated Sentences</a></li></ul></div></p>
<p>This is more ridiculous than anything Balki Bartokomous opined on. Interracial couples fight all the time, over their differences as much as their common humanity. My Asian-American warned me from the start not to call her "oriental," which is only supposed to refer to inanimate objects, so I already have a cultural minefield to avoid. For fun she nibbles on "fish snacks," the suicide bomber of disgusting munchables dressed as normal treats, whose aroma explodes my nose whenever her mouth approaches mine.</p>
<p>As a laid-back white guy whose earning prospects in the creative industries are magnitudes below the painfully productive Asian doctors and bankers my gal's relatives pushed her toward, I'm already viewed warily by her family, and <a href="http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/TheChecks.html">giving them a bag of oranges</a> won't help. Neither does my love for Conan O'Brien, whose comedy is "not natural" according to the gal's dad. Then there's the language barrier - I'm looking around befuddled as the Cantonese flies around the dinner table and bits of English creep in. The same occurs even for my Mandarin Chinese friend and his Cantonese gal. Two Wongs don't always make a right.</p>
<p>The next time you see a colorful couple laughing it up, drinking in love on a billboard, shake your head in disbelief.  There's only one certainty that comes from an interracial pairing: Their kids, like Fred Armisen or any mid-level bad guy on "24," will be able to play characters of multiple races, hence better earning potential.  Isn't that what really brings us together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.culturalimperialist.com/2010/01/interracial-couples-happy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
